The article by Davis, Acoustic Cyberspace, seemed to me very confusing and uninformative. His style of writing and choice of vocabulary makes the context hard to understand. Most of his main points are backed by wordy examples and explanations. My Quote: “Through resonance in a physical system, a small activity or event can gain a great deal of energy; for example, if I belted out a pitch that resonated with the unique acoustic characteristics of this room, the energy of my voice would be amplified by the environment. That’s why some singers can shatter a glass with their voice: they hit the resonant frequency of the glass (which is a space and contains a space), making it vibrate to the point of shattering.” This is the most easy to understand example that Davis provides. He uses it to explain what resonance is.
Nordstrom’s introduction to the class is much easier to understand. She introduces this class with an interesting approach that makes the readers intrigued to the context. In this quote: ”
Beware matey, there is no parlay on this island if you don’t fulfill the course outcomes! As you will see below, I addressed Outcomes One and Two, which focus on context awareness and the use of evidence in the paper. In the paper I argue that the use of sound, and especially narration, is essential in portraying the mood and feeling the director intended. I demonstrated that I was aware of the viewer and provided thoughtful ideas about the importance of the voice-over in this clip” she stays in context while sticking to her theme making it interesting.